By Olivia Le Poidevin and Valerie Volcovici
GENEVA (Reuters) -Hopes for a “last chance” ambitious global treaty to curb plastic pollution have dimmed as delegates gather this week at the United Nations in Geneva for what was intended to be the final round of negotiations.
Diplomats and climate advocates warn that efforts by the European Union and small island states to cap virgin plastic production – fuelled by petroleum, coal and gas – are threatened by opposition from petrochemical-producing countries and the U.S. administration under Donald Trump.
Delegates will meet officially from Tuesday for the sixth round of talks, after a meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5) in South Korea late last year ended without a path forward on capping plastic pollution.
The most divisive issues include capping production, managing plastic products and chemicals of concern, and financing to help developing countries implement the treaty.
Delegates told Reuters that oil states, including Saudi Arabia and Russia, plan to challenge key treaty provisions and push for voluntary or national measures, hindering progress toward a legally binding agreement to tackle the root cause of plastic pollution.
Government spokespeople for Saudi Arabia and Russia were not immediately available for comment,
Andres Del Castillo, senior attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), a non profit providing legal counsel to some countries attending the talks, said oil states were questioning even basic facts about the harm to health caused by plastics.
“We are in a moment of revisionism, where even science is highly politicized,” he said.
The U.S. State Department told Reuters it will lead a delegation supporting a treaty on reducing plastic pollution that doesn’t impose burdensome restrictions on producers that could hinder U.S. companies.
A source familiar with the talks said the U.S. seeks to limit the treaty’s scope to downstream issues like waste disposal, recycling and product design.
It comes as the Trump administration rolls back environmental policies, including a longstanding finding on greenhouse gas emissions endangering health.
Over 1,000 delegates, including scientists and petrochemical lobbyists, will attend the talks, raising concerns among proponents of an ambitious agreement that industry influence may create a watered-down deal focused on waste management, instead of production limits.
ISLAND STATES VULNERABLE
Plastic production is set to triple by 2060 without intervention, choking oceans, harming human health and accelerating climate change, according to the OECD.
“This is really our last best chance. As pollution grows, it deepens the burden for those who are least responsible and least able to adapt,” said Ilana Seid, permanent representative of Palau and chair of the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS).
Small island states are particularly impacted by plastic waste washing ashore, threatening their fishing and tourism economies. They stress an urgent need for dedicated international funding to clean up existing pollution.
“Plastics are a concern for human health because (plastic) contains about 16,000 chemicals, and a quarter of these are known to be hazardous to human health,” said Dr. Melanie Bergmann of the Alfred Wegener Institute in Germany.
Jodie Roussell, global public affairs lead at food giant Nestle and a member of a 300-company coalition backing a treaty to reduce plastic pollution, told Reuters that harmonizing international regulations on packaging reduction and sustainable material use would be the most cost-effective approach.
French politician Philippe Bolo, a member of the global Interparliamentary Coalition to End Plastic Pollution, said that a weak, watered down treaty that focuses on waste management must be avoided.
Bolo and a diplomatic source from a country attending the talks said the potential of a vote or even a breakaway agreement among more ambitious countries could be explored, as a last resort. Inger Andersen, executive director of the United Nations Environment Programme, however, said countries should push for a meaningful pact agreed by consensus.
“We’re not here to get something meaningless… you would want something that is effective, that has everybody inside, and therefore everybody committed to it,” she said.
(Reporting by Olivia Le Poidevin in Geneva; Valerie Volcovici in Washington and additional reporting by Alexander Marrow in London; Editing by Susan Fenton)
Comments